For both are infinite.
Follow hey_its_cameron on Twitter




I’m glad God isn’t really like that.
undercovernun:

Reblogged from a whole bunch of people, including… purpleferretspirit:pinktriangleonhersleeve:laughingsquid:




Draw a circle around the one God loves the most.



Now this is not a god I would want to worship.

You know what?  Me neither.
While I don’t want to get too deep into the theology of baptism, if I believed that God loved any person any less because that person hadn’t been sprinkled, dunked, or splashed with water, then I would choose not to be a Christian.
Making such a distinction is just like the argument in the early church about whether converts to The Way had to be circumcised.  Does God love this man more than that one, because this one has been circumcised?  It sounds absolutely ridiculous, doesn’t it?  And yet, people are willing to believe that an action performed by a human being can cause God to love this person more than God loves that one.  It is patently absurd.  And the reason is right there for us in scripture, written in a letter to a group of early followers of The Way:

For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor rulers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor anything else in all  creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ  Jesus our Lord.

It’s that simple.  Absolutely nothing can separate us from the love of God.  Nothing.  Not circumcision nor un-circumcision.  Not water nor lack of water.  Not priestly blessing nor human cursing. Not anything at all.  Nothing.
God loves us all. Period. Full stop.
Amen! Alleluia!

I’m glad God isn’t really like that.

undercovernun:

Reblogged from a whole bunch of people, including… purpleferretspirit:pinktriangleonhersleeve:laughingsquid:

Draw a circle around the one God loves the most.

Now this is not a god I would want to worship.

You know what?  Me neither.

While I don’t want to get too deep into the theology of baptism, if I believed that God loved any person any less because that person hadn’t been sprinkled, dunked, or splashed with water, then I would choose not to be a Christian.

Making such a distinction is just like the argument in the early church about whether converts to The Way had to be circumcised.  Does God love this man more than that one, because this one has been circumcised?  It sounds absolutely ridiculous, doesn’t it?  And yet, people are willing to believe that an action performed by a human being can cause God to love this person more than God loves that one.  It is patently absurd.  And the reason is right there for us in scripture, written in a letter to a group of early followers of The Way:

For I am convinced
that neither death, nor life,
nor angels, nor rulers,
nor things present, nor things to come,
nor powers,
nor height, nor depth,
nor anything else in all creation,
will be able to separate us
from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.

It’s that simple.  Absolutely nothing can separate us from the love of God.  Nothing.  Not circumcision nor un-circumcision.  Not water nor lack of water.  Not priestly blessing nor human cursing. Not anything at all.  Nothing.

God loves us all. Period. Full stop.

Amen! Alleluia!



POST DETAILS:
Posted on October/3/2011
Originally Posted by: scienceblogs.com Reblogged From: undercovernun

POST NOTES:
  1. nhmortgagebroker reblogged this from laughingsquid
  2. hereidreamtiwasaheroine reblogged this from kileykitty
  3. diagas reblogged this from kileykitty and added:
    I’d write down the word “ME” in crayon and then circle it
  4. princesshanh reblogged this from kileykitty
  5. kileykitty reblogged this from loridorn and added:
    plants, obviously but really this is disturbing
  6. deejayrogers reblogged this from hey-its-cameron and added:
    Nonononono…God ain’t like that. God is not that simple. Nor does He play favorite with any of His creations. Seriously,...
  7. hey-its-cameron reblogged this from undercovernun and added:
    I’m glad God isn’t really like that.
  8. asimplisticreality reblogged this from thesleepyphotog
  9. thesleepyphotog reblogged this from fuckthecause
  10. thewhiskerbiscuit reblogged this from fuckthecause
  11. yayymayorbee reblogged this from fuckthecause
  12. paradoxically-manipulative reblogged this from fuckthecause
  13. eyjayy reblogged this from fuckthecause
  14. fuckthecause reblogged this from literaryfool
  15. mangosjuice reblogged this from warlach
  16. thoughtcollections reblogged this from topherlee
  17. warlach reblogged this from roflsforbreakfast
  18. purpleferretspirit reblogged this from undercovernun and added:
    I agree with you. But I also believe that the animal should be on the same level as humans.
  19. undercovernun reblogged this from purpleferretspirit and added:
    Reblogged from a whole bunch of people, including… purpleferretspirit:pinktriangleonhersleeve:laughingsquid:
  20. gabebullard reblogged this from matthurst
  21. matthurst reblogged this from amyvernon and added:
    Is this the Stairway to Heaven? Also, where are adults in in this infographic?
  22. bridierox reblogged this from pleatedjeans
  23. badbananna reblogged this from afternoonsnoozebutton and added:
    seriously? seriously?!
  24. demonmilk reblogged this from smithereeens
  25. smithereeens reblogged this from emilycolor
  26. quandoeulembrar reblogged this from pleatedjeans
  27. armwrestlingemily reblogged this from kelly-thistle and added:
    I would’ve just drawn massive circle around the lot…
^ Scroll to Top